4.6 Article

Lifetime Prediction of Sessile Droplet Evaporation with Coupled Fields

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 60, 期 43, 页码 15782-15792

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c02576

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51776064, 52076077]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [2020DF002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the evolution of droplet evaporation through theoretical analysis and numerical simulation. It is found that internal thermocapillary convection and external natural convection can promote droplet evaporation, while interfacial evaporative cooling can impede it. The results suggest that the evaporation lifetime may be overestimated by the isothermal model in certain scenarios.
The evaporation of sessile droplets has wide applications in various industrial fields. Therefor; it is important to accurately predict the temporal evolution behavior of sessile droplets during evaporation. In this paper, both theoretical analysis and numerical simulation are carried out to explore the evolution of droplet evaporation, with internal thermocapillary convection, interfacial evaporative cooling, and external natural convection coupled together. It is found that internal thermocapillary convection and external natural convection can promote droplet evaporation, while interfacial evaporative cooling can impede it. When a droplet evaporates in a constant contact radius mode, there is a critical initial contact angle, below which the isothermal model can overestimate the evaporation lifetime, and the critical initial contact angle becomes large with increasing substrate superheat. Finally, when the droplet evaporates in the constant contact angle mode, the 2/3 power law still holds for transient variation of droplet volume, as predicted by the isothermal model. These findings may help obtain insights into the mechanism of droplet evaporation and provide guidance for inkjet printing and surface cooling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据