4.6 Article

Modeling AMP Degradation Product Formation

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 60, 期 50, 页码 18337-18360

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c03963

关键词

-

资金

  1. ACT ALIGN CCUS Project [271501]
  2. RVO (NL)
  3. FZJ/PtJ (DE)
  4. Gassnova (NO)
  5. UEFISCDI (RO)
  6. BEIS (UK)
  7. European Commission under the Horizon 2020 programme ACT [691712]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the origin of degradation products from amines used in carbon capture is crucial for developing new systems. Using density functional theory, this study investigated the thermal and oxidative degradation products formation pathways of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP). Results show that AMP is more likely to form dimethyloxazolidinone, whereas the formation of amides from organic acids and AMP is unlikely. Additionally, ammonia and low-molecular-weight organic acids can be formed favorably through AMP radical fragmentation.
A thorough understanding of the origin of all products arising from the degradation of amines used in carbon capture is crucial for the development of new and improved systems. Here, we present density functional theory (DFT) studies investigating the routes to thermal and oxidative degradation products of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP). The formation of dimethyloxazolidinone (DMOZD) via the cyclization of carbamates, carbamic acids, and/or isocyanates is more favored for AMP than for monoethanolamine (MEA). In contrast, the formation of amides from the reaction of organic acids and AMP is unlikely due to large free activation energies. 2,4-Lutidine is predicted to form via the reaction of ammonia, propanone, and ethanal. Ammonia and low-molecular-weight organic acids are predicted to form favorably from AMP radical fragmentation. The network of elementary reactions investigated here can form the basis of a larger chemical kinetic model, which could be instrumental in predicting product formation in novel systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据