4.7 Article

Engineering Parallel Algorithms for Community Detection in Massive Networks

期刊

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPDS.2015.2390633

关键词

Disjoint community detection; graph clustering; parallel Louvain method; parallel algorithm engineering; network analysis

资金

  1. project Parallel Analysis of Dynamic Networks-Algorithm Engineering of Efficient Combinatorial and Numerical Methods - Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts Baden-Wurttemberg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The amount of graph-structured data has recently experienced an enormous growth in many applications. To transform such data into useful information, fast analytics algorithms and software tools are necessary. One common graph analytics kernel is disjoint community detection (or graph clustering). Despite extensive research on heuristic solvers for this task, only few parallel codes exist, although parallelism will be necessary to scale to the data volume of real-world applications. We address the deficit in computing capability by a flexible and extensible community detection framework with shared-memory parallelism. Within this framework we design and implement efficient parallel community detection heuristics: A parallel label propagation scheme; the first large-scale parallelization of the well-known Louvain method, as well as an extension of the method adding refinement; and an ensemble scheme combining the above. In extensive experiments driven by the algorithm engineering paradigm, we identify the most successful parameters and combinations of these algorithms. We also compare our implementations with state-of-the-art competitors. The processing rate of our fastest algorithm often reaches 50 M edges/ second. We recommend the parallel Louvain method and our variant with refinement as both qualitatively strong and fast. Our methods are suitable for massive data sets with billions of edges. (A preliminary version of this paper appeared in Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Parallel Processing (ICPP 2013) [35].)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据