4.7 Article

Graph Convolutional Networks for Drug Response Prediction

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2021.3060430

关键词

Drug response prediction; interpretability; deep learning; graph convolutional network; saliency map

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a novel method called GraphDRP based on graph convolutional networks for drug response prediction and finds that graph representation can improve prediction performance.
Background: Drug response prediction is an important problem in computational personalized medicine. Many machine-learning-based methods, especially deep learning-based ones, have been proposed for this task. However, these methods often represent the drugs as strings, which are not a natural way to depict molecules. Also, interpretation (e.g., what are the mutation or copy number aberration contributing to the drug response) has not been considered thoroughly. Methods: In this study, we propose a novel method, GraphDRP, based on graph convolutional network for the problem. In GraphDRP, drugs were represented in molecular graphs directly capturing the bonds among atoms, meanwhile cell lines were depicted as binary vectors of genomic aberrations. Representative features of drugs and cell lines were learned by convolution layers, then combined to represent for each drug-cell line pair. Finally, the response value of each drug-cell line pair was predicted by a fully-connected neural network. Four variants of graph convolutional networks were used for learning the features of drugs. Results: We found that GraphDRP outperforms tCNNS in all performance measures for all experiments. Also, through saliency maps of the resulting GraphDRP models, we discovered the contribution of the genomic aberrations to the responses. Conclusion: Representing drugs as graphs can improve the performance of drug response prediction. Availability of data and materials: Data and source code can be downloaded athttps://github.com/hauldhut/ GraphDRP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据