4.7 Article

Average Operation Time of Bundle Protocol in Delay/Disruption-Tolerant Networks

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
卷 21, 期 8, 页码 5801-5813

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2022.3143533

关键词

Protocols; Wireless communication; Transmitters; Uplink; Downlink; Probabilistic logic; Delays; Average operation time (AOT); average file delivery time (AFDT); bundle protocol; delay; disruption tolerant network; performance analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides a holistic probabilistic analysis of the Bundle Protocol (BP) process, specifically focusing on the number of error bundles and the position of the last error bundle in each transmission round. An exact solution for the average operation time (AOT) of the BP process is derived, and the optimal bundle size that minimizes the file delivery time is also determined based on the results.
Performance analysis of the Bundle Protocol (BP) in Delay/ disruption-Tolerant Networks (DTN) has gained much interest. The analytic work of the average operation time (AOT) in BP, for different channel conditions and system parameters, though critical to understanding performance and designing system, is still incomplete. Existing results, such as the average file delivery time (AFDT), provide reasonably close estimates in some cases but exhibit large discrepancies in other cases. In this paper, we provide a holistic probabilistic analysis of the BP process, particularly in the number of error bundles and the position of the last error bundle in each and the last rounds of transmission. We provide, for the first time, an exact solution for the AOT of the BP process. The derivation works for both symmetric and asymmetric channels and is in general for any given maximum number of transmissions rounds. When the unlimited number of transmission rounds is considered, AOT becomes AFDT. The results are further utilized to select the optimal bundle size that gives the minimum file delivery time. Validation via simulations and comparison with existing work are also provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据