4.7 Article

Spinal Codes Over Fading Channel: Error Probability Analysis and Encoding Structure Improvement

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
卷 20, 期 12, 页码 8288-8300

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2021.3091719

关键词

Decoding; Wireless communication; Upper bound; Rayleigh channels; Performance analysis; Complexity theory; Channel coding; Spinal codes; FER analysis; Rayleigh fading channel; encoding structure improvement

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61871147, 62071141, 61831008, 61371102]
  2. Shenzhen Municipal Science and Technology Plan [GXWD20201230155427003-20200730122528002]
  3. Guangdong Science and Technology Planning Project [2018B030322004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By conducting performance analysis and proposing an improved encoding structure for Spinal codes, the reliability and anti-noise performance over the Rayleigh fading channel can be significantly enhanced.
In order to facilitate the reliability of data transmission of Spinal codes over the fading channel, performance analysis of Spinal codes is conducted, and an improved encoding structure is proposed. First, we derive an approximate frame error rate (FER) upper bound for Spinal codes over the Rayleigh fading channel in the finite block length (FBL) regime. Then, inspired by the FER analysis process, we propose an improved encoding structure, named self-concatenation structure, to reduce the FER of Spinal codes. In addition, a parallel structure is proposed for Spinal codes to improve the decoding throughput. For the self-concatenation structure, simulation results show that it exhibits a significant gain in anti-noise performance compared with the original Spinal codes over the Rayleigh fading channel. For the parallel structure, we find that by combining the parallel structure with the self-concatenation structure, not only is the encoding and decoding throughput of Spinal codes significantly improved but also the FER of Spinal codes is reduced.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据