4.7 Article

Generalized Assignment for Multirobot Systems via Distributed Branch-and-Price

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 1990-2001

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2021.3120046

关键词

Task analysis; Robots; Costs; Robot kinematics; Robot sensing systems; Partitioning algorithms; Resource management; Cooperating Robots; distributed robot systems; optimization and optimal control; planning; scheduling and coordination

类别

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program [638992-OPT4SMART]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article presents a branch-and-price algorithm for self-assignment of tasks in a network of agents, where each agent locally solves small problems and communicates with neighbors to converge to the optimal solution. By implementing the proposed algorithm in a robot operating system testbed, the team of heterogeneous robots successfully solved the task assignment problem.
In this article, we consider a network of agents that has to self-assign a set of tasks while respecting resource constraints. One possible formulation is the generalized assignment problem, where the goal is to find a maximum payoff while satisfying capability constraints. We propose a purely distributed branch-and-price algorithm to solve this problem in a cooperative fashion. Inspired by classical (centralized) branch-and-price schemes, in the proposed algorithm, each agent locally solves small linear programs, generates columns by solving simple knapsack problems, and communicates to its neighbors a fixed number of basic columns. We prove finite-time convergence of the algorithm to an optimal solution of the problem. Then, we apply the proposed scheme to a generalized assignment scenario, in which a team of robots has to serve a set of tasks. We implement the proposed algorithm in a Robot Operating System testbed and provide experiments for a team of heterogeneous robots solving the assignment problem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据