4.8 Article

Artificial Neural Network Based Particle Swarm Optimization for Microgrid Optimal Energy Scheduling

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
卷 36, 期 11, 页码 12151-12157

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3074964

关键词

Training; Microgrids; Optimal scheduling; Meteorology; Job shop scheduling; Search problems; Schedules; Artificial neural network (ANN); energy management (EM); microgrid (MG); optimization algorithm; scheduling

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia [20190101LRGS-UNITEN]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a method to enhance ANN using PSO for managing RESs in VPP system and experimentally validates the optimal energy scheduling for ANN.
This letter proposes an enhancement for artificial neural network (ANN) using particle swarm optimization (PSO) to manage renewable energy resources (RESs) in a virtual power plant (VPP) system. This letter highlights the comparison of the ANN-based binary particle swarm optimization (BPSO) algorithm with the original BPSO algorithm. The comparison has been made upon searching the optimal value of the number of nodes in the hidden layers and the learning rate. These parameter values are used in ANN training for microgrid (MG) optimal energy scheduling. The proposed approach has been tested in the VPP system covering MGs involving RESs to minimize the power and giving priority to sustainable resources to participate instead of buying power from the utility grid. This model is tested using real load demand recorded for 24 h in Perlis state, the northern part of Malaysia. Besides, real weather condition data are recorded by Tenaga Nasional Berhad Research solar energy meteorology for a 1-h average (e.g., solar irradiation, wind speed, battery status data, and fuel level). The results show that ANN-PSO gives precise decision compared with BPSO algorithm, which in turn prove that the enhancement for the neural net reaches the optimum level of energy scheduling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据