4.8 Article

Self-Supervised Visual Feature Learning With Deep Neural Networks: A Survey

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2020.2992393

关键词

Task analysis; Visualization; Videos; Training; Learning systems; Feature extraction; Annotations; Self-supervised learning; unsupervised learning; convolutional neural network; transfer learning; deep learning

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IIS-1400802]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews deep learning-based self-supervised general visual feature learning methods, covering motivation, pipeline, architectures, schema, evaluation metrics, datasets, performance comparisons, and future directions.
Large-scale labeled data are generally required to train deep neural networks in order to obtain better performance in visual feature learning from images or videos for computer vision applications. To avoid extensive cost of collecting and annotating large-scale datasets, as a subset of unsupervised learning methods, self-supervised learning methods are proposed to learn general image and video features from large-scale unlabeled data without using any human-annotated labels. This paper provides an extensive review of deep learning-based self-supervised general visual feature learning methods from images or videos. First, the motivation, general pipeline, and terminologies of this field are described. Then the common deep neural network architectures that used for self-supervised learning are summarized. Next, the schema and evaluation metrics of self-supervised learning methods are reviewed followed by the commonly used datasets for images, videos, audios, and 3D data, as well as the existing self-supervised visual feature learning methods. Finally, quantitative performance comparisons of the reviewed methods on benchmark datasets are summarized and discussed for both image and video feature learning. At last, this paper is concluded and lists a set of promising future directions for self-supervised visual feature learning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据