4.8 Article

Deep Learning for 3D Point Clouds: A Survey

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3005434

关键词

Three-dimensional displays; Shape; Deep learning; Object detection; Laser radar; Task analysis; Sensors; Deep learning; point clouds; 3D data; shape classification; shape retrieval; object detection; object tracking; scene flow; instance segmentation; semantic segmentation; part segmentation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61972435, 61602499, 61872379]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2019A1515011271]
  3. Science and Technology Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality [JCYJ20190807152209394]
  4. Australian Research Council [DP150100294, DP150104251]
  5. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  6. Academy of Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, deep learning on point clouds has been gaining more attention, but it is still in its early stages due to the unique challenges faced in processing point clouds with deep neural networks.
Point cloud learning has lately attracted increasing attention due to its wide applications in many areas, such as computer vision, autonomous driving, and robotics. As a dominating technique in AI, deep learning has been successfully used to solve various 2D vision problems. However, deep learning on point clouds is still in its infancy due to the unique challenges faced by the processing of point clouds with deep neural networks. Recently, deep learning on point clouds has become even thriving, with numerous methods being proposed to address different problems in this area. To stimulate future research, this paper presents a comprehensive review of recent progress in deep learning methods for point clouds. It covers three major tasks, including 3D shape classification, 3D object detection and tracking, and 3D point cloud segmentation. It also presents comparative results on several publicly available datasets, together with insightful observations and inspiring future research directions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据