4.8 Article

Topology-Aware Graph Pooling Networks

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3062794

关键词

Topology; Network topology; Task analysis; Diversity reception; Training; Sampling methods; Feature extraction; Deep learning; graph neural networks; graph pooling; graph topology

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IIS-2006861]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work introduces a topology-aware pooling (TAP) layer that explicitly considers graph topology for more accurate node selection. The TAP layer incorporates both local and global voting processes to generate ranking scores for each node, resulting in improved performance in graph classification tasks compared to previous methods.
Pooling operations have shown to be effective on computer vision and natural language processing tasks. One challenge of performing pooling operations on graph data is the lack of locality that is not well-defined on graphs. Previous studies used global ranking methods to sample some of the important nodes, but most of them are not able to incorporate graph topology. In this work, we propose the topology-aware pooling (TAP) layer that explicitly considers graph topology. Our TAP layer is a two-stage voting process that selects more important nodes in a graph. It first performs local voting to generate scores for each node by attending each node to its neighboring nodes. The scores are generated locally such that topology information is explicitly considered. In addition, graph topology is incorporated in global voting to compute the importance score of each node globally in the entire graph. Altogether, the final ranking score for each node is computed by combining its local and global voting scores. To encourage better graph connectivity in the sampled graph, we propose to add a graph connectivity term to the computation of ranking scores. Results on graph classification tasks demonstrate that our methods achieve consistently better performance than previous methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据