4.7 Article

Enhanced System Robustness of Asynchronous BCI in Augmented Reality Using Steady-State Motion Visual Evoked Potential

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3140772

关键词

Visualization; Electroencephalography; Headphones; Augmented reality; Resists; Decoding; Steady-state; Electroencephalography; augmented reality; brain computer interfaces; SSVEP; SSMVEP

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Engage-Plus Grant [416317307]
  2. Cognixion Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effect of background change on steady state visually evoked potentials (SSVEP) and steady state motion visually evoked potentials (SSMVEP) based brain computer interfaces (BCI) in a small-profile augmented reality (AR) headset. The results showed that SSMVEP was more robust to background change compared to SSVEP and had higher decoding accuracy using the C-CNN method.
This study evaluated the effect of change in background on steady state visually evoked potentials (SSVEP) and steady state motion visually evoked potentials (SSMVEP) based brain computer interfaces (BCI) in a small-profile augmented reality (AR) headset. A four target SSVEP and SSMVEP BCI was implemented using the Cognixion AR headset prototype. An active (AB) and a non-active background (NB) were evaluated. The signal characteristics and classification performance of the two BCI paradigms were studied. Offline analysis was performed using canonical correlation analysis (CCA) and complex-spectrum based convolutional neural network (C-CNN). Finally, the asynchronous pseudo-online performance of the SSMVEP BCI was evaluated. Signal analysis revealed that the SSMVEP stimulus was more robust to change in background compared to SSVEP stimulus in AR. The decoding performance revealed that the C-CNN method outperformed CCA for both stimulus types and NB background, in agreement with results in the literature. The average offline accuracies for W = 1 s of C-CNN were (NB vs. AB): SSVEP: 82% +/- 15% vs. 60% +/- 21% and SSMVEP: 71.4% +/- 22% vs. 63.5% +/- 18%. Additionally, for W = 2 s, the AR-SSMVEP BCI with the C-CNN method was 83.3% +/- 27% (NB) and 74.1% +/- 22% (AB). The results suggest that with the C-CNN method, the AR-SSMVEP BCI is both robust to change in background conditions and provides high decoding accuracy compared to the AR-SSVEP BCI. This study presents novel results that highlight the robustness and practical application of SSMVEP BCIs developed with a low-cost AR headset.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据