4.6 Article

Conductive Backscatter Communication for Dual-Chamber Leadless Pacemakers

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2022.3147978

关键词

Backscatter; Antennas; Electrodes; Couplings; Lead; Implants; Impedance; Backscatter communication; biomedical implants; conductive coupling; deep implant communication; intrabody communication; leadless pacemaker (PM)

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway [270957]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dual-chamber and multichamber leadless pacemakers (PMs) are emerging solutions for reducing the limitations of conventional wire-based PMs. This article proposes a one-way backscatter communication based on conductive coupling for leadless PMs, enabling communication between the implant capsules and an on-body device without an active transmitter.
Dual-chamber and multichamber leadless pacemakers (PMs) are emerging solutions for reducing the limitations of conventional wire-based PMs. One of the main challenges in migrating to leadless PMs is having reliable and low-power data telemetry among the PMs inside the heart chambers. Backscatter communication is a solution for battery-constrained data links and can be applied for the implants using specific designs. In this article, we propose one-way backscatter communication based on conductive coupling for leadless PMs. The implant capsules can communicate with an on-body device without having any active transmitter. The complexity and power consumption are shifted to the remote on-body reader. Dual-chamber PM communication is enabled by using the subcarrier technique for discriminating the devices in the frequency domain. A low data rate of about 11 kb/s is assigned to each PM capsule to communicate its vital information to the reader. The proposed system is designed and realized using off-the-shelf electronic components. The whole system is evaluated in an in vivo experiment. Results indicate the potential of using conductive backscatter for wireless communication in leadless PMs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据