4.4 Article

Quantitative Identification of Airgap Flux Density Harmonics Contributing to Back EMF in Dual-Permanent-Magnet-Excited Machine

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS
卷 58, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2021.3076498

关键词

Rotors; Stators; Harmonic analysis; Genetic expression; Stator windings; Windings; Torque; Analytical; back electromotive force (EMF); dual-permanent-magnet-excited (DPME); identification

资金

  1. Science and Technology Innovation Committee of Shenzhen [ZDSYS201604291912175]
  2. Department of Education of Guangdong Province [2020ZDZX3002]
  3. Macao Science and Technology Development Fund (FDCT) of Macao Government [FDCT/040/2017/A1]
  4. University of Macau [MYRG2017-00158-FST]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a partial-analytical-method (PAM) to quantitatively identify field harmonics that have a negative impact on back electromotive force (EMF) in dual-permanent-magnet-excited (DPME) machines, and applies it to a 12/10 DPME machine, revealing that two types of harmonics are responsible for negative contribution to back EMF.
Due to the bidirectional field modulated effect, the dual-permanent-magnet-excited (DPME) machine relies on the countless airgap flux density harmonics with specific pole-pair numbers (PPNs) to produce stable torque or effective back electromotive force (EMF). Regarding the generation of back EMF, there is no doubt that the flux density harmonics which make a negative contribution will reduce the performance of DPME machine. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is very little research on the identification of field harmonics which play a negative role in the generation of back EMF. In this article, the partial-analytical-method (PAM) is proposed to quantitatively identify the field harmonics. First, the PAM is described in detail, and the ratio of contribution (RoC) is defined to assess the contribution of field harmonics to back EMF. Then, the PAM is applied to a 12/10 DPME machine. The identification results show that two of the five types of field harmonics, i.e., Type-II and Type-V, make a negative contribution to back EMF; the RoCs of which are -2.94% and -4.32%, respectively. In these two types of harmonics, the ones with PPN = 22 are mainly responsible for the negative contribution to back EMF, which needs attention at the outset of the design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据