4.7 Article

Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation Network With Iterative dCRF

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3141107

关键词

Semantics; Cams; Image segmentation; Convolution; Annotations; Feature extraction; Training; Weakly-supervised; semantic segmentation; image-level annotations

资金

  1. Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Marine Geology in Tongji University
  2. Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering in Shanghai Jiaotong University
  3. Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province [2016TP1020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A weakly-supervised semantic segmentation network utilizing graph convolution and iterative dCRF was proposed in this study, achieving high accuracy by combining CAMs and node features generated by ResNet and using graph convolution for feature propagation.
This Autonomous driving methods driven by big data are becoming more and more perfect, but the cost of existing data labeling is too high, so how to reduce or even not label data has attracted more and more attention. Semantic segmentation networks supervised by image-level annotations are all trained using pseudo-labels. Most methods use image classification networks to generate class activation maps (CAMs) and start with CAMs to diffuse features to other parts of the target to obtain pseudo-labels. However, due to its weak supervision information, it is difficult for the existing methods to obtain better results. Therefore, we propose a weakly-supervised semantic segmentation network with iterative dCRF based on graph convolution. Specifically, we use ResNet to generate CAMs and node features and then use graph convolution for feature propagation and merge the low-level and high-level semantic information of the image. Then execute dCRF in an iterative manner, and finally obtain refined pseudo-labels. On the PASCAL VOC 2012 data set, our model achieves an mIoU of 63.5%, which is 0.3% higher than the graph convolutional network method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据