4.5 Article

Gaussian Multiple and Random Access Channels: Finite-Blocklength Analysis

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY
卷 67, 期 11, 页码 6983-7009

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2021.3111676

关键词

Gaussian multiple access channel; Gaussian random access channel; third-order asymptotics; finite block-length; maximum likelihood decoder; dispersion

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CCF-1817241]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents finite-blocklength achievability bounds for the Gaussian multiple access channel (MAC) and random access channel (RAC) under average-error and maximal-power constraints, extending the improvement of performance beyond known results. The proposed rateless coding strategy and decoding method achieve the same performance as the best known result for the Gaussian MAC in operation, with improvements in terms of first-, second-, and third-order performance.
This paper presents finite-blocklength achievability bounds for the Gaussian multiple access channel (MAC) and random access channel (RAC) under average-error and maximal-power constraints. Using random codewords uniformly distributed on a sphere and a maximum likelihood decoder, the derived MAC bound on each transmitter's rate matches the MolavianJazi-Laneman bound (2015) in its first- and second-order terms, improving the remaining terms to 1/2 log n/n + O (1/n) bits per channel use. The result then extends to a RAC model in which neither the encoders nor the decoder knows which of K possible transmitters are active. In the proposed rateless coding strategy, decoding occurs at a time n(t) that depends on the decoder's estimate t of the number of active transmitters k. Single-bit feedback from the decoder to all encoders at each potential decoding time n(i), i <= t, informs the encoders when to stop transmitting. For this RAC model, the proposed code achieves the same first-, second-, and third-order performance as the best known result for the Gaussian MAC in operation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据