4.8 Article

Wireless Time Sensitive Networking Impact on an Industrial Collaborative Robotic Workcell

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 7351-7360

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2022.3151786

关键词

IEEE 802; 11 Standard; Synchronization; Wireless communication; Standards; Robots; Service robots; Wireless sensor networks; Collaborative robotics; IEEE 802; 11; wireless time sensitive networking (WTSN)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, a methodology and models for evaluating a time sensitive collaborative robotics application enabled by wireless time sensitive networking (WTSN) capabilities are described. A method for configuring WTSN scheduling to meet the application time budget and validating it in an industrial use case is also presented. The performance of key WTSN capabilities, including time synchronization and time-aware scheduling, over an IEEE 802.11 based network are implemented and characterized. The performance of the wireless network is correlated to the application performance of a collaborative robotic workcell.
In this article, we describe a methodology and associated models to evaluate a time sensitive collaborative robotics application enabled by wireless time sensitive networking (WTSN) capabilities. We also present a method to configure WTSN scheduling to meet the application time budget and validate it in a realistic industrial use case. We detail the methodologies for implementing and characterizing the performance of key WTSN capabilities, namely time synchronization and time-aware scheduling, over an IEEE 802.11 based network. We deploy the WTSN capabilities with a collaborative robotic workcell consisting of two robotic arms, which emulate a material handling application, known as machine tending. We further explore configurations and measurement methodologies to characterize application performance of this use case and correlate it to the performance of the wireless network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据