4.8 Article

Coordinating Electric Vehicle Flow Distribution and Charger Allocation by Joint Optimization

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 17, 期 12, 页码 8112-8121

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2021.3059288

关键词

Manganese; Stochastic processes; Resource management; Charging stations; Optimization; Roads; Informatics; Charger allocation; convex optimization; electric vehicle (EV); traffic flow distribution; two-stage stochastic programming

资金

  1. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region [CityU-11 206 320, TII-20-4783]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The two-stage stochastic programming model proposed in the study can find high-quality charger allocation and optimal flow distribution policies under different traffic conditions, preventing over-investment on charging resources.
A two-stage stochastic programming model is established to minimize EV's expected total journey time under stochastic traffic conditions, by jointly optimizing the allocation of chargers and the distribution of EV flows. Based on sample average approximation, a feasible deterministic equivalent of the original stochastic problem is obtained. Then, a hybrid solution method, composing of a Tabu-based search and sequential quadratic programming (SQP), is proposed. The Tabu heuristic manages the charger allocation problem, where each solution candidate undergoes a second-stage EV flow optimization. SQP is applied to optimally distribute the EV flows, which is proved to be a convex problem. Extensive simulations are carried out using the eastern Massachusetts highway network. Results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms existing approaches by finding high-quality charger allocation and optimal flow distribution policies under different traffic conditions. Additionally, the two-stage model designates charging resource sufficiency by statistically estimating a lower bound for the number of chargers to allocate, which in practice helps to prevent over-investment on charging resources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据