4.7 Article

Atmospheric Phase Screen Compensation on Wrapped Ground-Based SAR Interferograms

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2021.3055648

关键词

Synthetic aperture radar; Strain; Refractive index; Monitoring; Instruments; Indexes; Decorrelation; Atmospheric phase screen (APS); ground-based systems; synthetic aperture radar (SAR); SAR interferometry

资金

  1. National Operational Programme for Research and Competitiveness 2007-2013 through the Infrastructure of High Technology for Environmental and Climate Monitoring [PONa3_00363]
  2. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research [D.D. 2261]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work proposes a method for estimating and compensating the atmospheric phase screen in ground-based synthetic aperture radar (GB-SAR) interferograms, and its validity is confirmed through experiments, especially in areas with medium-to-high topographic slopes.
This work proposes a method for estimating and compensating the atmospheric phase screen (APS) in sets of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) interferograms generated with a ground-based SAR (GB-SAR) instrument. We address the presented approachx2019;s physical, statistical, and mathematical framework by discussing its potential and limitations. In contrast with other existing algorithms that estimate the APS from the unwrapped phase signals, our methodology is based on the straightforward analysis of the wrapped phases, directly. Therefore, the method is not affected by any potential phase unwrapping mistake, and it is suitable for multitemporal interferometric SAR (InSAR) applications. The effects of the local topography, the decorrelation noise, and the ground deformation on the APS estimates are deeply studied. Experiments performed on simulated and real GB-SAR InSAR data corroborate the validity of the theory. In particular, the simulated results show that the method is beneficial in zones with medium-to-high topographic slopes (e.g., for Alpine and mountainous regions).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据