4.6 Article

Nucleation-Limited Switching Dynamics Model for Efficient Ferroelectrics Circuit Simulation

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES
卷 69, 期 1, 页码 395-399

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2021.3131290

关键词

Mathematical models; Integrated circuit modeling; Iron; Switches; Numerical models; Circuit simulation; Probability density function; Capacitor; ferroelectric; film; incubation time; nucleation-limited; polarization reversal; polycrystalline

资金

  1. SRC [2018-LM-2832, 2020-LM-3000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nucleation-limited switching (NLS) model has been successful in explaining the dynamics of polarization switching in polycrystalline ferroelectric films in various experiments, but its mathematical complexity has hindered its implementation in realistic circuit simulations with complex driving waveforms. By reformulating NLS as a generalized polarization rate equation, researchers have been able to capture nucleation incubation time and intra- and inter-grain switching statistics accurately, paving the way for efficient numerical finite-difference computation and verification in circuit simulations.
The nucleation-limited switching (NLS) model has been shown in the literature to explain successfully the dynamics of polarization switching of polycrystalline ferroelectric films (FE) in various experiments. However, because of its mathematical complexity, the NLS model has yet to be implemented correctly and efficiently in the simulation of actual, experimental circuits with complex driving waveforms. Here, we reformulate NLS as a generalized polarization rate equation that captures correctly the incubation time of nucleation and the intra- and inter-grain switching statistics of kinetics without any restrictions on waveform and switching time scales. This formulation forms the basis for efficient numerical finite-difference computation, which is verified in realistic circuit simulations of a number of experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据