4.6 Article

Investigation and Modeling of Z-Interference in Poly-Si Channel-Based 3-D NAND Flash Memories

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES
卷 69, 期 2, 页码 543-548

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2021.3137094

关键词

Ash; Integrated circuit modeling; Solid modeling; Logic gates; Programming; Grain boundaries; Simulation; 3-D charge trap nitride (CTN) nand flash memory; grain boundary (GB) traps; Monte Carlo simulation; poly-Si channel; SPICE; TCAD; Z-interference

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the Z-interference in 3-D CTN NAND flash memory is investigated using TCAD simulation. The research reveals that Z-interference is caused by the programming of neighbor word lines and results in a shift in the threshold voltage of the victim word line. The study also explores the program state dependency and the effect of different channel materials on Z-interference.
In this article, the Z-interference in 3-D charge trap nitride (CTN) nand flash memory is investigated using technology computer-aided design (TCAD) simulation. In 3-D CTN nand flash memory, Z-interference is caused by the neighbor word line (WL) programming. When a neighbor WL is programed, nitride layer-induced barrier enhancement (NIBE) and charge spreading effects in the nitride layer cause a threshold voltage ( $V_{t}$ ) shift in the victim WL. Also, the victim WL program state dependency of Z-interference caused by the charge spreading effect is investigated. In monocrystalline Si channel, there is a program sequence dependency due to the drain bias-induced barrier lowering (DIBL) effect. However, poly-Si channel has different characteristics because of grain boundaries. Therefore, Z-interference due to poly-Si grain boundary (GB) trap position randomness and GB trap density variation is analyzed. Finally, Z-interference is modeled using Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis (SPICE), and the $V_{t}$ distribution according to the Z-interference is modeled using a Monte Carlo simulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据