4.6 Article

Praseodymium-Doped In-Sn-Zn-O TFTs With Effective Improvement of Negative-Bias Illumination Stress Stability

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES
卷 69, 期 1, 页码 152-155

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2021.3126278

关键词

Amorphous oxide semiconductors (AOSs); flat panel displays; rare earth element doping; thin-film transistors (TFTs)

资金

  1. International Cooperation Key Project
  2. Bureau of International Cooperation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [174433KYSB20180050]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LD21F040002, LY20F010002]
  4. Ningbo Public Service Technology Foundation, China [202002N3156]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, amorphous praseodymium-doped In-Sn-Zn-O thin-film transistors (ITZO-Pr TFTs) were fabricated under different RF magnetron sputtering powers to improve negative-bias illumination stress (NBIS) stability. The optimized ITZO-Pr TFTs showed improved field effect mobility and reduced light responsivity compared to ITZO TFTs. Furthermore, Pr doping altered the relaxation processes of photoelectrons and lowered the activation energy, enhancing the NBIS stability of ITZO TFTs.
In this work, amorphous praseodymium-doped In-Sn-Zn-O (ITZO-Pr) thin-film transistors (TFTs) were fabricated with improved negative-bias illumination stress (NBIS) stability under different radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering powers. The optimized ITZO-Pr TFTs presented field effect mobility (mu(FE)) of 20.9 cm(2).V-1.s(-1), steep subthreshold (SS) of 0.27 V/dec, and small threshold voltage shift (Delta V-th = -2.12 V) under NBIS (-20 V, 3600 s). All Pr-doped devices exhibited a reduction in light responsivity of more than one order of magnitude compared with ITZO TFTs. Moreover, after Pr doping, relaxation processes of photoelectrons changed and then the activation energy (E-a) of light-induced electrons relaxation decreased, which enhanced the NBIS stability of ITZO TFTs effectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据