4.6 Article

Dynamic Event-Triggered Consensus of General Linear Multi-Agent Systems With Adaptive Strategy

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCSII.2022.3144280

关键词

Numerical simulation; Consensus protocol; Topology; Behavioral sciences; Multi-agent systems; Multi-agent systems; consensus; general linear dynamics; dynamic event-triggered strategy; adaptive strategy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61873136, 62033007]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2021MF089]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the consensus problem of multi-agent systems (MASs) with general linear dynamics. An adaptive event-triggered strategy is applied to reduce communication frequency and avoid dependence on global information. A dynamic event-triggered strategy, which provides more flexibility in determining the event-trigger threshold, is proposed. The event-trigger condition is designed based on continuous relative measurement and improved to only utilize event-triggered information. Sufficient criteria are derived to guarantee consensus, and it is proven that the designed event-trigger conditions can exclude Zeno behavior. Numerical simulations are conducted to validate the effectiveness of the obtained results.
Consensus of multi-agent systems (MASs) with general linear dynamics is investigated. In order to reduce communication frequency and avoid dependence on global information, adaptive event-triggered strategy is applied. A kind of dynamic event-triggered strategy, which is more flexible in giving event-trigger threshold, is proposed. An event-trigger condition based on continuous relative measurement is first designed. Then, the event-trigger condition is improved to only utilize event-triggered information. Sufficient criteria are derived to guarantee consensus. Moreover, it is proved that the designed event-trigger conditions can exclude Zeno behavior. Numerical simulation is performed to verify the effectiveness of the obtained results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据