4.4 Article

Electromagnetic Performance Analysis of an Axial Flux Hybrid Excitation Motor for HEV Drives

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2021.3101785

关键词

Axial flux permanent magnet (AFPM); hybrid excitation; Soft magnetic composites (SMC); speed control range

资金

  1. NationalNatural Science Foundation of China [51877093]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFE0100200]
  3. Key Technical Innovation Program of Hubei Province [2019AAA026]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2019CFB759]
  5. Key research of Educational Commission of Hubei Province [D20201407]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The technique utilizes the advantages of soft magnetic composites to design axial flux permanent magnet motors with high power density and efficiency, overcoming the issue of constant power speed ratio by adding an additional DC excitation winding. Finite element algorithm assessment shows that this motor has larger torque density and a wider speed range, suitable for hybrid electric vehicle drive applications.
Drive machines of hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) employ axial flux permanentmagnet (AFPM) motors on account of its high power density and high efficiency. The technique takes full advantage of the performance and manufacturing preponderances of soft magnetic composites (SMC). Specifically, it includes low iron consumption at high frequency and high speed, convenient machining and small relative magnetic permeability. An extra DC excitation winding is appended to the motor to conquer the drawbacks of the constant power speed ratio. It can provide an extremely wide constant power speed region, which ensures the excellent property of the machine. Finite element algorithm (FEA) is used to assess the property of axial flux hybrid excitation motor (AFHEM). Comprehensive analysis has fully indicated that larger torque density and wider speed range can be obtained by the AFHEM, which is appropriate for the application of HEV drives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据