4.7 Article

Robust RSSI-Based Indoor Positioning System Using K-Means Clustering and Bayesian Estimation

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 21, 页码 24462-24470

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3113837

关键词

Bayesian estimation; indoor positioning; k-means clustering; log-distance path loss model; RSSI

资金

  1. Foundation for Research Support of the State of Amazonas (FAPEAM) [6.008/2006]
  2. Samsung Electronics of Amazonia Ltda [8.387/1991, 003/2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a novel indoor positioning system called KLIP, which uses the K-means clustering algorithm to enhance indoor environment characterization and position estimation accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that KLIP outperforms naive Bayesian and k-nearest neighbors algorithms, particularly in terms of reducing training dataset size and online processing time.
This work proposes a new indoor positioning system, named KLIP, that uses the K-means clustering algorithm to split the environment into different sets of log-distance propagation models in order to better characterize the indoor environment and further improve the position estimation using Bayesian inference. Our proposed method is validated in a large-scale, real-world scenario composed of Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)-based devices. We demonstrate, throughout the paper, that the addition of location information of training points to the received signal strength indicator (RSSI) as an attribute for the clustering step improves the positioning accuracy. Moreover, the obtained results show that our solution outperforms the naive Bayesian estimation up to 12% - regarding the positioning accuracy - and the broadly deployed kNN for reduced training dataset size - regarding both accuracy and online processing time. In this sense, KLIP proves to be an efficient and scalable alternative when both site-survey effort and energy consumption constraints must be taken into account.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据