4.7 Article

Ensemble Machine Learning-Based Affective Computing for Emotion Recognition Using Dual-Decomposed EEG Signals

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 2496-2507

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3135953

关键词

EEG; emotion recognition; multiclass classification; ensemble learning; machine learning; DREAMER

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compares machine learning-based algorithms with conventional machine learning algorithms for emotion recognition from EEG signals. The results show that machine learning-based algorithms outperform conventional machine learning algorithms in multiclass emotion recognition.
Machine learning (ML)-based algorithms have shown promising results in electroencephalogram (EEG)-based emotion recognition. This study compares five ensemble learning-based ML (EML) algorithms with five conventional ML (CML) algorithms for recognizing multiple human emotions from EEG signals. A publicly available DREAMER database having nine emotions is used to design ML-based system, which is validated on SEED, INTERFACES, and MUSEC databases. In this study, initially, EEG signals are separated into theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands by applying discrete wavelet transform and then empirical mode decomposition is applied for further decomposition of band-separated EEG signals into intrinsic mode functions (IMFs). Then, 31 statistical features are extracted from IMFs to design ML-based system using five multiclass EML algorithms such as bagging, random forest, rotation random forest, extreme gradient boost, and adaptive boosting. Finally, the performance of these five EML algorithms is evaluated using 10-fold cross- validation and compared against five CML algorithms using performance evaluationmetrics such as accuracy, F1-score, kappa-score, and area-under-the-curve (AUC). The mean accuracy of multiclass emotion recognition over five EML algorithms is similar to 5.87% and similar to 6.08% higher than the mean accuracy of five CML algorithms, for both arousal (88.95% vs. 83.08%) and valence (88.90% vs. 82.81%) dimensions, respectively. The EML-based bagging algorithm reported the highest accuracy, F1-score, kappa-score, and AUC of 95.81%, 0.81, 0.79, and 0.98, respectively for arousal and 95.53%, 0.80, 0.77, and 0.98, respectively for valence. A similar trend is also observed on the three validation datasets. The EML algorithms provide better multiclass emotion recognition compared to CML algorithms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据