4.7 Article

3D Posture Estimation and Automatic Adjustment of Zebrafish Larvae

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 23, 页码 26921-26930

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3120770

关键词

Estimation; Sensors; Training; Microinjection; Labeling; Feature extraction; Microscopy; Pose estimation; keypoints detection; automatic microinjection; zebra-fish

资金

  1. Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province [GDZB-138]
  2. Natural Science-Foundation of Chin [51807079]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The irregular surface of zebrafish larvae presents challenges for fixing their bodies, leading to high requirements for injection target points and posture control. A zebrafish dataset containing key points and posture annotations was established, and a neural network model designed for zebrafish key point recognition. Through three-dimensional coordinate transformation, posture angle information was accurately calculated, demonstrating improved accuracy in zebrafish posture angle determination under changing postures. An operating platform was also designed to fix zebrafish juveniles and precisely adjust their posture, laying the foundation for further experimental operations.
Due to the irregular surface of zebrafish larvae and the difficulty of fixing the body, there are high requirements for its injection target point and posture control. By establishing a zebrafish data set containing key points and three-dimensional posture annotations, a network model for zebrafish key point recognition is designed using convolutional neural networks. The posture angle information is further calculated through three-dimensional coordinate transformation. Experiments demonstrate that this method can obtain a more accurate zebrafish posture angle under the condition of posture change. In response to this method, an operating platform that can fix zebrafish juveniles and precisely adjust their posture is designed to lay the foundation for subsequent experimental operations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据