4.2 Article

Performance of Controller Designs in Small-Disturbance Angle Stability of Power Systems with Parametric Uncertainties

期刊

IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS
卷 19, 期 12, 页码 2054-2061

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TLA.2021.9480147

关键词

Jacobian matrices; Uncertainty; Power system stability; Power system dynamics; Monte Carlo methods; IEEE transactions; Dynamic scheduling; angle stability; automatic generation control; controller design; parametric uncertainties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a computational methodology for evaluating the effect of parametric uncertainties on the small-signal stability analysis of power systems. A probabilistic approach is applied as a metric for the dynamic performance. The results show the potential usefulness of the method for quantifying the effect of parametric uncertainties in power systems dynamics simulations.
The electric power system is a complicated dynamic system with a range of operating states and parametric uncertainties, especially due to change of the network topology, load increment and generation scheduling. Under this circumstance, traditional power system transient stability analysis methods may not always be appropriate. This paper presents the development of a computational methodology for evaluating the effect of parametric uncertainties on the small-signal stability analysis of power systems. A probabilistic approach is applied as a metric for the dynamic performance of the damping ratio of critical eigenvalues. The method is based on a Monte Carlo simulation for the analysis of automatic control of generation. The methodology is used for the performance evaluation of three classical controller tuning techniques: Frequency Response, Approximate Method and Ziegler-Nichols. The results show that the methodology is valid and potentially useful for quantifying the effect of parametric uncertainties in power systems dynamics simulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据