4.7 Article

Clutter Suppression in GPR B-Scan Images Using Robust Autoencoder

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2020.3026007

关键词

Clutter; Ground penetrating radar; Sparse matrices; Soil; Buried object detection; Principal component analysis; Pipelines; Clutter suppression; ground penetrating radar (GPR); low-rank and sparse matrix representation; robust autoencoder (RAE)

资金

  1. Zhuan Fa Shi (ZFS) [Y9E0151M26]
  2. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [Z181100000118004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This letter proposes a new clutter suppression method based on robust autoencoder (RAE) for ground-penetrating radar (GPR). The method decomposes a GPR B-scan image into low-rank and sparse components to capture clutter and underground object responses respectively. The results show that the proposed RAE-based algorithm outperforms commonly used clutter removal algorithms.
Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is a well-known geophysical electromagnetic method used to detect the underground facilities such as landmines, pipelines, and cavities. In general, the clutter presented in GPR B-scan image obscures the underground objects, thus damaging the performance of the underground object detection algorithm. In this letter, we proposed a new clutter suppression method based on robust autoencoder (RAE). The proposed algorithm decomposes a GPR B-scan image into its low-rank and sparse components. The low-rank component catches the clutter, whereas the sparse component captures the underground object responses. The commonly used clutter removal algorithms, mean subtraction (MS), singular value decomposition (SVD), robust principal component analysis (RPCA), and morphological component analysis (MCA), are compared with the proposed algorithm on both the numerical simulated data and real GPR data. The visual and quantitative results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed RAE-based algorithm over the widely used state-of-the-art clutter removal algorithms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据