4.7 Article

Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning With Smoothed Representation for Remote Sensing

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2021.3069799

关键词

Remote sensing; Task analysis; Feature extraction; Satellites; Supervised learning; Image resolution; Head; Classification; contrastive learning; remote sensing; self-supervised learning; smoothed representation

资金

  1. Kyungpook National University Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This letter introduces a contrastive self-supervised learning technique based on the SimCLR framework, which utilizes smoothed representation to enhance recognition in remote sensing.
In remote sensing, numerous unlabeled images are continuously accumulated over time, and it is difficult to annotate all the data. Therefore, a self-supervised learning technique that can improve the recognition rate using unlabeled data will be useful for remote sensing. This letter presents contrastive self-supervised learning with smoothed representation for remote sensing based on the SimCLR framework. In self-supervised learning for remote sensing, the well-known characteristic that images within a short distance might be semantically similar is usually used. Our algorithm is based on this knowledge, and it simultaneously utilizes several neighboring images as a positive pair of the anchor image, unlike existing methods such as Tile2Vec. Furthermore, MoCo and SimCLR, which are among the state-of-the-art self-supervised learning approaches, only use two augmented views of the single-input image, but our proposed approach uses multiple-input images and averages their representations (e.g., smoothed representation). Consequently, the proposed approach outperforms state-of-the-art self-supervised learning methods, such as Tile2Vec, MoCo, and SimCLR, in the cropland data layer (CDL), RESISC-45, UCMerced, and EuroSAT data sets. The proposed approach is comparable to the pretrained ImageNet model in the CDL classification task.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据