4.7 Article

New Feature Selection Methods Using Sparse Representation for One-Class Classification of Remote Sensing Images

期刊

IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 1761-1765

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2020.3006830

关键词

Feature extraction; Training; Sparse matrices; Image reconstruction; Hyperspectral imaging; Feature selection; one-class classification (OCC); sparse representation

资金

  1. National Natural Foundation of China [41371329]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, two novel feature selection methods for one-class classification of remote sensing images using sparse representation were proposed. The methods, feature selection based on sample reconstruction (FSSR) and feature selection based on feature reconstruction (FSFR), were evaluated and compared with existing methods in two different case studies. Experimental results showed that both methods generally outperformed the existing ones.
In this letter, we proposed two novel feature selection methods using sparse representation for one-class classification of remote sensing images. In the first method, a sparse reconstructive weight matrix of the data set was obtained by reconstructing samples using sparse representation. The good features were then selected by evaluating reconstructing errors in weight matrix. The method is called feature selection based on sample reconstruction (FSSR). In the second method, the weight matrix was obtained by reconstructing features using sparse representation. Feature selection was then conducted by evaluating correlation among features using weight matrix. The method is called feature selection based on feature reconstruction (FSFR). The proposed feature selection methods were evaluated and compared with several state-of-the-art feature selection methods in two different case studies. The experimental results indicate that the proposed methods generally outperformed the existing methods. In particular, FSFR produced stable better performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据