4.6 Article

Electromagnetic Wave Propagation in an Externally Modulated Low-Pass Transmission Line

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2016.2604319

关键词

Active circuits; capacitors; dielectric constant; eigenvalues and eigenfunctions; low-pass filters; microwave circuits; microwave propagation; phase measurement; propagation; RLC circuits; transmission line measurements; varactors; waves

资金

  1. CONACYT [103644-F, 317142]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a novel concept of a modulated transmission line: a low-pass dynamic transmission line (DTL) whose capacitors are replaced by varactors that are externally modulated in tandem. The modulation voltages are periodic in time and identical in all the unit cells (and there is no pump wave). Accurate modeling leads to two bands, beta(1)(omega) and beta(2)(omega) for the propagation constant, separated by a gap Delta beta. We have fabricated an eight-cell DTL and measured beta(1,2)(omega) for a range of frequencies of the signal wave up to the modulation frequency f(M) = 310 MHz, finding very good agreement between the experimental and theoretical results. These are also compared with an effective medium description, with the dynamic permittivity epsilon(t) being equal to the distributed capacitance C(t)/a at every instant t and the permeability mu equal to the distributed inductance L/a, where a is the size of the unit cell. There is good agreement for long wavelengths, beta a less than or similar to 1, including the beta-gap, which, for negligible resistive effects, is proportional to the modulation strength. Such gaps are characteristic of periodicity in time of a parameter and were predicted for temporal photonic crystals. We have also confirmed experimentally that for every frequency f, a harmonic of frequency f(M) - f is excited, giving rise to beats when f congruent to f(M)/2. We expect these experimental and theoretical results to open a new platform for useful applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据