4.6 Article

Performance Evaluation of Scaled ZnO Stacked Nanosheet Channel Ternary Field Effect Transistor

期刊

IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS
卷 43, 期 2, 页码 323-326

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LED.2021.3139225

关键词

Zinc oxide; II-VI semiconductor materials; Logic gates; Dielectrics; Multivalued logic; Threshold voltage; Performance evaluation; Intermediate current; intermediate state; low power; ternary logic; quantum confinement effect; ZnO SNTFET

资金

  1. Creative Materials Discovery Program on Creative Multilevel Research Center [2015M3D1A1068062, 2017M3D1A1040828]
  2. FEOL Platform Technology Development Program [2020M3F3A2A02082436]
  3. Global Frontier Hybrid Interface Materials (GFHIM) through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea - Ministry of Science and ICT [2013M3A6B1078873]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work investigates the scaling prospect of ZnO stacked nanosheet channel ternary field effect transistor, as well as the impact of scaling geometric parameters on its performance. The results show that compared to other ternary logic devices, this device has lower power consumption and higher noise margin in the intermediate state. The feasibility for stable ternary circuit operation is also confirmed.
Ternary logic device technologies have been actively researched due to the potential benefits such as lower power consumption, smaller device count, smaller area, and higher data processing density, compared to their binary counterparts. In this work, scaling prospect of ZnO stacked nanosheet channel ternary field effect transistor has been investigated. The benefits of scaling geometric parameters such as gate dielectric thickness, channel length, and source/drain charge injection area are examined. 90 % lower power consumption in the intermediate state is achieved at V-dd = 1 V with a noise margin of 130 mV, compared to other emerging ternary logic devices. The feasibility for stable ternary circuit operation is confirmed as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据