4.6 Article

Low-Temperature (70°C) Cu-to-Cu Direct Bonding by Capping Metal Layers

期刊

IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS
卷 42, 期 10, 页码 1524-1527

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LED.2021.3105434

关键词

3D integration; Cu bonding; metal passivation

资金

  1. Center for the Semiconductor Technology Research from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within Ministry of Education (MOE), Taiwan
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 110-2634F-009-027, MOST 109-2221-E-009-023-MY3, MOST 1102221-E-A49-086-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed Cu-Cu direct bonding at low temperature using Cr wetting layer and Au passivation, achieving high quality bonding with ultra-low thermal budget. The bonding mechanism involves Cu atoms diffusing through metal layers to form a new inter-layer without voids, ensuring good electrical performance and high reliability for 3D integration applications.
Cu-Cu direct bonding at low temperature with Cr wetting layer and Au passivation has been developed, and the bonding mechanism has been investigated. A chip-level Cu-to-Cu direct bonding can be achieved under a very low thermal budget condition at 70 degrees C for 90 s or 150 degrees C for 15 s, while wafer level bonding can be achieved at 100 degrees C under a low vacuum environment (10(-2) Torr) by deposition of capping metal layers, which can protect Cu from oxidation, as well as reduce surface roughness and grain size of Cu. During the bonding process, Cu atoms diffuse through Cr/Au layers into the bonding interface, forming a new inter-layer without voids to achieve high quality bonding. The phenomenon of recrystallization and effects of grain size have been validated by TEM analyses. This Cu-Cu bonding with capping metal layers scheme can enable bonding with ultra-low thermal budget, excellent bonding quality, good electrical performance and high reliability, showing the great feasibility for the 3D integration applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据