4.6 Article

Learning Hidden Influences in Large-Scale Dynamical Social Networks

期刊

IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 61-103

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/MCS.2021.3092810

关键词

-

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [20-01-00619]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estimating interpersonal influence from empirical data is a central challenge in studying social structures and dynamics. Opinion dynamics theory, as an interdisciplinary science, has potential applications in marketing, advertising, and recommendations. The aim is to infer social influence qualitatively and quantitatively from data, with a focus on opinions dynamics models, structural constraints, and algorithms for network structure inference.
Interpersonal influence estimation from empirical data is a central challenge in the study of social structures and dynamics. Opinion dynamics theory is a young interdisciplinary science that studies opinion formation in social networks and has huge potential in applications such as marketing, advertising, and recommendations. The term social influence refers to the behavioral change of individuals due to the interactions with others in a social system (for example, organizations, communities, and society in general). The advent of the Internet has made a huge volume of data easily available to measure social influence across large populations. The aim of this work is to qualitatively and quantitatively infer social influence from data, from a systems and control viewpoint. First, definitions and models of opinions dynamics are introduced, and structural constraints of online social networks are considered based on the notion of sparsity. Then, the main approaches to infer a network's structure from a set of observed data are reviewed. Finally, algorithms that exploit the introduced models and structural constraints are presented, focusing on sample complexity and computational requirements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据