4.6 Article

Hybrid Analog-Digital SAR Instrument With Reflector Antenna and Overlapped Subarray Feed for Earth Observation

期刊

IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS
卷 20, 期 11, 页码 2110-2114

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LAWP.2021.3102868

关键词

Antenna feeds; Antenna arrays; Synthetic aperture radar; Reflector antennas; Azimuth; Instruments; Array signal processing; Antenna arrays; feeds; synthetic aperture radar (SAR)

资金

  1. European Space Agency [40000127990/19/NL/AF]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As part of ESA's studies on new instruments for Earth observation, a SAR architecture based on overlapped array antennas was designed last year. The objective is to develop a test unit of a reflector-based SAR antenna that supports novel multichannel wide-swath SAR architectures, utilizing multiple beams in azimuth and range/elevation directions. The hybrid SAR Instrument includes a large reflector with a feedarray capable of generating multiple beams on receive for digital processing.
As part of the European Space Agency (ESA) studies of new instrument for Earth observation, the design of a synthetic aperture radar (SAR) architecture based on overlapped array antennas was launched last year. The objective of the activity is to develop a test unit of a reflector based SAR antenna fed by an array organized in overlapped subarrays, supporting novel multichannel wide-swath SAR architectures, and exploiting multiple beams in both azimuth and range/elevation directions. In the letter, a hybrid analog/digital beamforming on reception with analog beamforming approach on transmission is analyzed. The antenna system consists of a large oversize reflector with a feedarray capable of generating multiple beams on receive for digital processing. In the letter, a description of the hybrid SAR Instrument is presented, describing the characteristics of the system, the antenna, the considered feedarray options and the main characteristics and system performances.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据