4.6 Article

Low-Profile and Broadband Dielectric Resonator Antenna Using Higher-Order Modes

期刊

IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS
卷 20, 期 10, 页码 1988-1992

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LAWP.2021.3101648

关键词

Broadband antennas; Dielectrics; Bandwidth; Resonant frequency; Broadband communication; Impedance; Dielectric resonator antennas; Broadband; dielectric resonator antenna; high-order mode; low profile

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62001081, 62071256]
  2. Dalian University of Technology [DUT19RC(3)014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A low-profile and broadband dielectric resonator antenna (DRA) design is proposed in this letter, utilizing different air regions to achieve excitation of higher-order DR modes with broadside radiation while suppressing unwanted off-boresight modes. The fabricated prototype covers a frequency range of 3.25-6.1 GHz for potential 5G applications, showing a broad bandwidth of approximately 64.2%, a peak antenna gain of around 9 dBi, and a low profile of only approximately 0.07 lambda(0).
The performance of a low-profile dielectric resonator (DR) antenna (DRA) is hardly maintained across a wide frequency range due to the multiple higher-order modes. In this letter, a low-profile and broadband DRA is proposed with stable broadside radiation over a wide range of frequencies. A detailed analysis of the excited modes is conducted to identify proper modes for broadband operation. Different air regions are then introduced in the top layer of the proposed DRA. This allows the excitation of the higher-order DR modes with broadside radiation while suppressing the unwanted off-boresight modes. To validate the design, the DRA is developed to cover the frequency range of 3.25-6.1 GHz for potential 5G applications. The fabricated prototype is measured showing a broad bandwidth of similar to 64.2%, a peak antenna gain of similar to 9 dBi, and a low profile of only similar to 0.07 lambda(0).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据