4.5 Review

A systemic review of endocardial left ventricular pacing

期刊

HEART & LUNG
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.10.003

关键词

Endocardial left ventricular pacing; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Left ventricular ejection disfunction; NYHA class

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endocardial left ventricular pacing is effective in improving cardiac function, left ventricular ejection fraction, and QRS width, but is associated with significant rates of complications and mortality during follow-up.
Background: Endocardial left ventricular pacing is an alternative technique used in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), when placement of a left ventricular lead is not possible via the coronary sinus or in non-responders to conventional CRT. Objectives: To review the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of endocardial left ventricular pacing. Methods: Systematic research on Medline (PubMed), ClinicalTrials.gov and Embase with the terms endocardial left ventricular pacing, biventricular pacing or endocardial left pacing was performed with the identification of 1038 results. Eleven studies with endocardial left ventricular pacing patients were included, independent of the technique being applied to naive CRT patients or con non-responders to conventional CRT. The end-point of this analysis was the impact of endocardial left ventricular pacing techniques regarding New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and QRS width, and the occurrence of complications Mean differences (MD) and confidence interval (CI) was used as a measurement of treatment. Results: A total of 560 patients were included, with different techniques used (trans-atrial septal technique, trans-ventricular septal technique and transapical technique). Significant improvement was registered in NYHA class (MD 0.73, CI 0.48-0.98, p<0.00001, I-2 = 87%), LVEF (MD -7.63, CI -9.93 - -5.33, p<0.00001, I-2 = 69%) and QRS width (MD 29.25, CI 9.99-48.50, p<0.00001, I Z = 91%). Several complications were reported after the procedure, 11 pocket infections, 22 transient ischemic attacks, 18 ischemic strokes, 41 thromboembolic events, among other complications. The mortality rate during the follow-up was 20.54%. Conclusion: Left ventricular endocardial pacing is a feasible alternative to conventional CRT, with clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiogrphic improvement. However, first data regarding this procedure was associated with significant complications rates. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据