Impact of COVID-19 lockdowns on mental health: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in England and Scotland

The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with worsening mental health but it is unclear whether this is a direct consequence of containment measures, like Stay at Home orders, or due to other considerations, such as fear and uncertainty about becoming infected. It is also unclear how responsive mental health is to a changing situation. Exploiting the different policy responses to COVID-19 in England and Scotland and using a difference-in-difference analysis, we show that easing lockdown measures rapidly improves mental health. The results were driven by individuals with lower socioeconomic position, in terms of education or financial situation, who benefited more from the end of the strict lockdown, whereas they suffered a larger decline in mental health where the lockdown was extended. Overall, mental health appears to be more sensitive to the imposition of containment policies than to the evolution of the pandemic itself. As lockdown measures may continue to be necessary in the future, further efforts (both financial and mental health support) are required to minimize the consequences of COVID-19 containment policies for mental health.

Automated summary

The study found that easing lockdown measures rapidly improves mental health, particularly for individuals with lower socioeconomic status. Overall, mental health appears to be more affected by containment policies than by the actual evolution of the pandemic itself. Further efforts are needed to minimize the negative impact of COVID-19 containment policies on mental health.