4.5 Article

Socioeconomic status, access to care, risk factor patterns, and stage at diagnosis for head and neck cancer among black and white patients

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hed.26977

关键词

distance to care; head and neck cancer; HPV-related cancer; late stage; latent class analysis; neoplasm stage; racial disparities; socioeconomic status

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01-CA90731]
  2. UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Cancer Control and Education Program [T32-CA057726]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the multidimensional influences of factors associated with the progression of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC), specifically focusing on race differences. The results indicate that socioeconomic status, access to care, and behavioral risk factors contribute to the association with advanced T-stage, and the differences by race warrant further investigation.
Background Little is known about how factors combine to influence progression of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). We aimed to evaluate multidimensional influences of factors associated with HNSCC stage by race. Methods Using retrospective data, patients with similar socioeconomic status (SES), access to care (travel time/distance), and behavioral risk factors (tobacco/alcohol use and dental care) were grouped by latent class analysis. Relative frequency differences (RFD) were calculated to evaluate latent classes by stage, race, and p16 status. Results We identified three latent classes. Advanced T-stage was higher for black (RFD = +20.2%; 95% CI: -4.6 to 44.9) than white patients (RFD = +10.7%; 95% CI: 2.1-19.3) in the low-SES/high-access/high-behavioral risk class and higher for both black (RFD = +29.6%; 95% CI: 4.7-54.5) and white patients (RFD = +23.9%; 95% CI: 15.2-32.6) in the low-SES/low-access/high-behavioral risk class. Conclusion Results suggest that SES, access to care, and behavioral risk factors combine to underly the association with advanced T-stage. Additionally, differences by race warrant further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据