4.8 Article

One-pot production of phenazine from lignin-derived catechol

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 1224-1230

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1gc04102a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Singapore Ministry of Education [R-279-000-597-114]
  2. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Singapore [R-279-000-604-592]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [21621004, 22078239]
  4. China Scholarship Council [202006250141]
  5. Tianjin Development Program for Innovation and Entrepreneurship (2018)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a simple strategy to convert catechol to phenazine, a useful N-heterocycle compound, for effective utilization of lignin-derived monomeric products in bio-refineries. The key steps leading to phenazine formation, including hydrogenation, amination, coupling, and dehydrogenation reactions, were identified through mechanistic investigations. The protocol was found extendable to produce substituted phenazines from other lignin-derived catechols.
Upgrading lignin-derived monomeric products is crucial in bio-refineries to effectively utilize lignin. Herein, we report a simple strategy to convert catechol to phenazine, a useful N-heterocycle three-aromatic-ring compound, whose current synthetic procedure is complex via a petroleum-derived feedstock. The reaction uses catechol as the sole carbon source and aqueous ammonia as reaction media and a nitrogen source. Without additional solvents, phenazine was obtained in 67% yield in the form of high purity crystals (>97%) over a Pd/C catalyst after a one-pot-two-stage reaction. When cyclohexane was used as a co-solvent in the first step, a higher yield (81%) and purity (>99%) were achieved. Mechanistic investigations involving control experiments and an isotope labeling study reveal that hydrogenation, amination, coupling and dehydrogenation reactions are the key steps leading to phenazine formation. The conversion of other lignin-derived catechols highlights that the protocol is extendable to produce substituted phenazines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据