4.7 Article

Improving Predictions of Stream CO2 Concentrations and Fluxes Using a Stream Network Model: A Case Study in the East River Watershed, CO, USA

期刊

GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES
卷 35, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GB006972

关键词

stream carbon; stream CO2; carbon cycling; stream network model; stream carbon reactive transport; river carbon cycling

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR-2103520]
  2. UMass Faculty Startup Funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inland waters are crucial for the global carbon budget, but predicting carbon fluxes in streams has been challenging due to variability in pCO(2) at different scales. A new stream network model incorporating CO2 input and output fluxes provides a process-based representation of stream CO2 dynamics, outperforming traditional statistical methods. This model reveals the transition of CO2 sources in streams and shows that atmospheric CO2 fluxes may be significantly underestimated on regional and global scales.
Inland waters are an important component of the global carbon budget. However, our ability to predict carbon fluxes from stream systems remains uncertain, as pCO(2) varies within streams at scales of 1-100 m. This makes direct monitoring of large-scale CO2 fluxes impractical. We incorporate CO2 input and output fluxes into a stream network advection-reaction model, representing the first process-based representation of stream CO2 dynamics at watershed scales. This model includes groundwater (GW) CO2 inputs, water column (WC), benthic hyporheic zone (BHZ) respiration, downstream advection, and atmospheric exchange. We evaluate this model against existing statistical methods including upscaling and multiple linear regressions through comparisons to high-resolution stream pCO(2) data collected across the East River Watershed in the Colorado Rocky Mountains (USA). The stream network model accurately captures GW, evasion, and respiration-driven pCO(2) variability and significantly outperforms multiple linear regressions for predicting pCO(2). Further, the model provides estimates of CO2 contributions from internal versus external sources suggesting that streams transition from GW- to BHZ-dominated sources between 3rd and 4th Strahler orders, with GW, BHZ, and WC accounting for 49.3%, 50.6%, and 0.1% of CO2 fluxes from the watershed, respectively. Lastly, stream network model atmospheric CO2 fluxes are 4-12x times smaller than upscaling technique predictions, largely due to relationships between stream pCO(2) and gas exchange velocities. Taken together, this stream network model improves our ability to predict stream CO2 dynamics and efflux. Furthermore, future applications to regional and global scales may result in a significant downward revision of global flux estimates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据