4.7 Article

Using Satellite Observations to Evaluate Model Microphysical Representation of Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 49, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL096191

关键词

Arctic amplificantion; cloud feedback; ice nucleation; climate models; satellite

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [714062, 758005]
  2. Norwegian Research Council [295046]
  3. Fulbright Student Research Grant
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [714062, 758005] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study highlights the importance of mixed-phase clouds in Arctic warming and the challenges of accurately representing them in climate models. By adjusting model microphysical variables to match cloud phase metrics, researchers were able to produce Arctic-constrained model runs and evaluate cloud feedbacks. The results suggest that mixed-phase processes play a key role in mediating the Arctic climate response to warming.
Mixed-phase clouds play an important role in determining Arctic warming, but are parametrized in models and difficult to constrain with observations. We use two satellite-derived cloud phase metrics to investigate the vertical structure of Arctic clouds in two global climate models that use the Community Atmosphere Model version 6 (CAM6) atmospheric component. We report a model error limiting ice nucleation, produce a set of Arctic-constrained model runs by adjusting model microphysical variables to match the cloud phase metrics, and evaluate cloud feedbacks for all simulations. Models in this small ensemble uniformly overestimate total cloud fraction in the summer, but have variable representation of cloud fraction and phase in the winter and spring. By relating modeled cloud phase metrics and changes in low-level liquid cloud amount under warming to longwave cloud feedback, we show that mixed-phase processes mediate the Arctic climate by modifying how wintertime and springtime clouds respond to warming.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据