4.7 Article

Extreme Water Vapor Transport During the March 2021 Sydney Floods in the Context of Climate Projections

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 48, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL095335

关键词

extreme rainfall; floods; CMIP6; integrated water vapor transport (IVT); moisture; climate change

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DE180100638]
  2. ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes [CE170100023]
  3. Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF)
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Climate and Environmental Sciences Division, Regional & Global Model Analysis Program [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. Environmental Resilience Institute - Indiana University's Prepared for Environmental Change Grand Challenge initiative
  6. Lilly Endowment, Inc.
  7. Australian Government
  8. Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study indicates that in the future, Sydney may experience more frequent and prolonged high water vapor transport events, and this change is correlated with the rate of global and regional warming in each model.
During March 2021, large regions of Eastern Australia experienced prolonged heavy rainfall and extensive flooding. The maximum daily mean column integrated water vapor transport (IVT) over Sydney during this event was within the top 0.3% of all days since 1980, and the 10-day mean IVT was in the top 0.2%. In this study, we have examined the change in frequency of extreme IVT events over Sydney in 16 climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 under two Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP245 and SSP585). Generalized Extreme Value modeling was used to further analyze the change in frequency of extreme IVT events. We found the probability of long duration high IVT events is projected to increase by 80% at the end of the century, but the future change in IVT is correlated to the rate of global and regional warming in each model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据