4.6 Article

A closer look at factors governing landslide recovery time in post-seismic periods

期刊

GEOMORPHOLOGY
卷 391, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107912

关键词

Landslide; Earthquake; Recovery; Rainfall; Post-seismic landslide processes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the relationship between earthquake-induced landslide recovery time and factors such as seismic effects, co-seismic landslide deposits, seismotectonic conditions, morphologic conditions, and climatic conditions. It suggests that the dominant post-seismic landsliding process plays a crucial role in determining the recovery time of landslide susceptibility after earthquakes.
Earthquakes increase landslide susceptibility in post-seismic periods. The time required for restoring preearthquake susceptibility levels is defined as landslide recovery time. Overall, stronger earthquakes are associated with relatively long recovery times in the literature. However, the seismic effect does not explain the whole process. This paper provides insight into factors governing this process. We hypothesize that the dominant post-seismic landsliding process (i.e., new or remobilized landslides), which is governed by the interactions between co-seismic landslide deposits and seismotectonic, morphologic and climatic conditions of a site, is the key to understand the physics behind the landslide recovery time. To test this argument, we analyze 11 earthquake-affected areas associated with seismic variables (i.e., earthquake magnitude and peak ground acceleration) and four environmental factors: (1) the fraction of area affected by co-seismic landslides (FAAL), (2) local relief, (3) average daily precipitation of extreme events (mm/day) and (4) rainfall seasonality. Our findings show that in areas with limited co-seismic landslide deposits (FAAL similar to 1%), then remobilization of material takes the role of the dominant mechanism and recovery may take longer than a year. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据