4.6 Article

Predictors of low bone density and fracture risk in Loeys-Dietz syndrome

期刊

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 419-429

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.10.002

关键词

Bone density; DXA; Fracture risk TGF?

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) patients commonly have reduced bone density and increased risk of fractures, possibly due to increased bone resorption. Certain clinical features can predict a subgroup of patients at highest risk of low bone density and fractures.
Purpose: Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) is a connective tissue disorder affecting multiple organ systems, including bone. Methods: We defined the bone phenotype and clinical predictors of low bone density and fracture risk in 77 patients with LDS type 1 to type 5. Results: Patients with LDS had dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Z-scores significantly < 0, and 50% of children and 9% of adults had Z-scores < -2. Sixty percent of patients had >1 fracture, and 24% of patients with spinal x-rays scans showed spinal compression fractures. Lower body mass index, asthma, male sex and eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease were correlated with lower DXA Z-scores. The count of 5 LDS-associated skeletal features (scoliosis, pes planus, arachnodactyly, spondylolisthesis, and camptodactyly) in patients with LDS was correlated with DXA Z-score. Adults with >1 skeletal features had DXA Z-scores significantly < 0, and children with >2 features had DXA Z-score significantly < -2. Bone turnover markers suggest accelerated bone resorption. Data from 5 patients treated with bisphosphonates suggest a beneficial effect. Conclusion: All LDS types are associated with reduced bone density and increased risk of fracture, which may be due to increased bone resorption. Clinical features can predict a subgroup of patients at highest risk of low bone density and fracture risk. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据