4.7 Article

Efficient hemogenic endothelial cell specification by RUNX1 is dependent on baseline chromatin accessibility of RUNX1-regulated TGFβ target genes

期刊

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
卷 35, 期 21-22, 页码 1475-1489

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.348738.121

关键词

hematopoiesis; hemogenic endothelium; RUNX1; TGF beta; endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition; endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition

资金

  1. [R01HL091724]
  2. [U01HL100405]
  3. [R01HD089245]
  4. [1F31HL150952-01]
  5. [T32 HD083185]
  6. [1F31HL120615]
  7. [T32 DK07780]
  8. [T32CA09140]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study highlights the role of RUNX1 in hematopoiesis, showing its ability to recruit TGFβ signaling effectors in the endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition. The efficiency of this transition is influenced by chromatin changes in endothelial cells at different developmental stages.
Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) are generated de novo in the embryo from hemogenic endothelial cells (HECs) via an endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition (EHT) that requires the transcription factor RUNX1. Ectopic expression of RUNX1 alone can efficiently promote EHT and HSPC formation from embryonic endothelial cells (ECs), but less efficiently from fetal or adult ECs. Efficiency correlated with baseline accessibility of TGF beta-related genes associated with endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT) and participation of AP-1 and SMAD2/3 to initiate further chromatin remodeling along with RUNX1 at these sites. Activation of TGF beta signaling improved the efficiency with which RUNX1 specified fetal ECs as HECs. Thus, the ability of RUNX1 to promote EHT depends on its ability to recruit the TGF beta signaling effectors AP-1 and SMAD2/3, which in turn is determined by the changing chromatin landscape in embryonic versus fetal ECs. This work provides insight into regulation of EndoMT and EHT that will guide reprogramming efforts for clinical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据