4.8 Review

REVIEWS IN BASIC AND CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 161, 期 6, 页码 1813-1829

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.09.059

关键词

Cyclooxygenase-2; Prostaglandin E2; Colorectal Cancer; Esophageal Cancer; Gastric Cancer; Tumor Immune Evasion; Tumor-Associated Angiogenesis; Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts

资金

  1. Hollings Cancer Center grant, Medical University of South Carolina [P30 CA138313]
  2. National Colorectal Cancer Research Alliance
  3. Alan & Kate Gibson Research Fellowship, 2018
  4. Department of Health and Human Services acting through the Victorian Cancer Agency, Victoria, Australia [MCRF16002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cyclooxygenase-2-prostaglandin E2 pathway plays an important role in the development of gastrointestinal cancer, promoting tumor growth and affecting host defenses. Overcoming tumor immune evasion is a major challenge in cancer immunotherapy.
Chronic inflammation is a known risk factor for gastrointestinal cancer. The evidence that nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs suppress the incidence, growth, and metastasis of gastrointestinal cancer supports the concept that a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug target, cyclooxygenase, and its downstream bioactive lipid products may provide one of the links between inflammation and cancer. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that the cyclooxygenase-2-prostaglandin E2 pathway can promote gastrointestinal cancer development. Although the role of this pathway in cancer has been investigated extensively for 2 decades, only recent studies have described its effects on host defenses against transformed epithelial cells. Overcoming tumor-immune evasion remains one of the major challenges in cancer immunotherapy. This review summarizes the impacts of the cyclooxygenase-2-prostaglandin E2 pathway on gastrointestinal cancer development. Our focus was to highlight recent advances in our understanding of how this pathway induces tumor immune evasion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据