4.7 Article

Improving the A/S ratio of pretreated coal fly ash by a two-stage roasting for Bayer alumina production

期刊

FUEL
卷 310, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122478

关键词

High alumina fly ash; Ash utilization; Desilication; Alumina

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By optimizing the desilication conditions, the research has successfully increased the alumina-silica mass ratio of coal fly ash, providing an economically viable high-quality raw material for Bayer process applications.
Coal fly ash has been considered as a potential resource for alumina production by Bayer process. However, the implementation is always limited by low alumina-silica mass ratio (A/S) of coal fly ash. Previously, we reported an approach to realize the desilication of coal fly ash and the A/S could reach 5.34. However, this A/S was still not high enough for Bayer process. Following the previous study, herein we systematically optimize the desilication conditions to further improve the A/S, and also evaluate the applicability of desilication residue for Bayer alumina production. First, the digestion properties of amorphous silicon dioxide and gamma-alumina in the two-stage roasted calcines are analyzed by thermodynamic calculation. The results indicate that their alkali-digestion properties become remarkably different at relatively high temperature, thus amorphous silicon dioxide could be digested while gamma-alumina is preserved in the residue by controlling the pH and digestion temperature. The desilication ratio and the A/S ratio could reach 82.27% and 7.46 at the optimal conditions of 116 g/L Na2O, 95 degrees C, 15 min digestion time and 1/10 solid-to-liquid ratio. The obtained desilication residue becomes acceptable and economical high grade raw material for Bayer process, which is confirmed by the production of standard alumina (AO-2, China). This research could provide an alternative economic process for recycling alumina from high-alumina coal fly ash.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据