4.7 Article

Sustainable alternative fuel effects on energy consumption of jet engines

期刊

FUEL
卷 304, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121378

关键词

Jet fuel; Fuel composition; Waste heat recovery; Energy efficiency; Sustainable aviation fuel

资金

  1. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration Office of Environment and Energy through ASCENT
  2. FAA Center of Excellence for Alternative Jet Fuels and the Environment, project 66 through FAA Award [13-C-AJFE-UD-027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By increasing the fuel temperature limit and improving fuel thermal efficiency, it is possible to achieve energy savings of over 0.5% in engine performance, with 60% coming from the high thermal stability of synthetic fuels.
High thermal stability enables engine manufacturers to increase the reliance on fuel as a heat sink while reducing the reliance on air, which wastes the energy used to compress it or increases aircraft drag. While the direct impact of waste heat recovery can translate into an energy savings of 0.2% if the maximum fuel temperature limit is increased to 160 degrees C (from 127 degrees C), there is a larger impact from a variety of options to improve the thermal efficiency of the engine. In this work, it is predicted that a combined savings of 0.5% or more is possible, 60% of which stems from leveraging the high thermal stability that synthetic fuels can afford. The engine performance and fuel system models that were developed to make these predictions, together with previously developed models to predict fuel properties from composition, have also been used in a series of Monte Carlo simulations to gage the impact of fuel composition variation on engine efficiency. A range of increased efficiency of 0.17% or 0.25% is predicted at high and low power, respectively. This works establishes a methodology to incorporate jet engine efficiency as an objective function in an algorithm designed to optimize sustainable alternative (jet) fuel composition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据